Archive for July, 2008

Katie Price walks to her car in Chester

Saturday, July 26th, 2008

July 24 – Katie Price (Jordan) at her car after leaving her book signing in Chester.

(more…)

Katie Price, Queen of Jordan

Thursday, July 17th, 2008

Katie Price (Jordan) signs copies of her new autobiography in Borders Bookstore on London’s Oxford Street, July 17

 

 

(more…)

53 photos of Katie’s cleavage out on the town

Thursday, July 17th, 2008

Katie ‘Jordan’ Price with great cleavage on a nightout with friends in London, July 16

  (more…)

Rebecca Gauld case confirms breach of privacy

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

 Katie And Peter: The Baby Diaries showed nanny Rebecca Gauld being sacked on the phone by Price and broadcasted Gauld’s phone number.

Ofcom (The independent regulator and competition authority for the UK communications industries)  ruled today that the ITV2 series Katie and Peter: The Baby Diaries treated nanny Rebecca Gauld unfairly and breached her privacy.

Gauld, a nanny once employed by model Katie Price and singer Peter Andre, complained that her privacy was unneccessarily infringed in the making and broadcast of the program. She also objected to the fact that the telephone conversation where Price sacked her was broadcast without her being informed.

The show, which aired last July, centred around the birth of Price and Andre’s second child.

In one episode, Price discovered that Gauld had gone on holiday to Portugal, despite informing her employers that she had visited her father in Wales. Price believed that Gauld had lied to her and let her down and so decided to terminate her employment.

The programme showed Gauld’s possessions being packed up into bin bags and a telephone conversation during which Price dismissed her. It also showed Gauld later arriving at the house to collect her belongings.

In its defence, ITV claimed that Gauld had been given an opportunity to respond to remarks put to her on camera by the show’s producer.

However, the regulator ruled that Gauld was not given an appropriate opportunity to respond to the allegations made against her and ruled that filming and broadcast of footage of her room and the broadcast of footage of her telephone number was an unwarranted infringement of her privacy.

The regulator also ruled that the recording and broadcast of footage of a telephone conversation with Price in which Gauld was dismissed from her position was also an unwarranted infringement of her privacy.

The regulator noted that Gauld had signed a release form in relation to the filming of footage of her, but added that “there was nothing in the form to suggest that her bedroom might be filmed in her absence or that Katie Price or her staff would be filmed going through her personal possessions”.

Ofcom considered that, at the time of the filming, Gauld was not on notice that she was about to be asked to leave her employment and therefore her home.

“There was nothing in the circumstances of the filming that diminished Ms Gauld’s expectation of privacy in relation to the room, which had in effect become her home,” Ofcom stated adding that she had a “legitimate expectation of privacy in relation to filming in her bedroom in her absence”.

Last week Price and Andre accepted substantial damages and a public apology at the high court in London from a News of the World story based on an interview with Gauld which falsely claimed that the couple were uncaring parents.

source: http://www.guardian.co.uk

Poor Peter : no sex for six months

Monday, July 7th, 2008

Katie Price is certainly no dream wife. The 30 year old cant find the time or motivation for sex? ‘We haven’t had sex for six months,’ says Katies’s husband Peter Andre on his wife’s 30th birthday during filming for Katie and Peter: The Next Chapter.

The ‘Mysterious Girl’ singer and the former glamour model – who have two children together, Junior, three, and one-year-old Princess Tiaamii, as well as Katie’s six-year-old son Harvey from a previous relationship – have been too busy to spend any romantic time alone together.

During a clip from their reality TV show ‘Katie and Peter: The Next Chapter’, Peter – who had organised a romantic weekend at a luxurious five star hotel to celebrate his wife’s recent 30th birthday – told her: “It is always the wrong time. It has only been six months. You’re giving it all the talk but we’ll see if you give it the walk later.”

Peter – who first met Katie on reality TV show ‘I’m a Celebrity … Get Me Out Of Here!’ – says having three young children affects their sex life as they always put the needs of their kids first.

He said: “Having children ruins it! But it’s about finding time for us as a couple and realizing sex is no longer the number one priority in our relationship.”

Peter has previously said he spends more time with step-son Harvey, 6, and children Junior, 3, and Princess Tiáamii, 1, than he does with his wife.

When asked how having a family affects their romantic life, he said: ‘It ruins it! But it’s about finding time for us as a couple and realising sex is no longer the number one priority in our relationship.’

Meanwhile, the couple have just won a libel trial over a tabloid article portraying them as bad parents.

The couple left the High Court in London yesterday after being awarded undisclosed, ‘substantial damages’ and a public apology.

They successfully sued the News Of The World regarding an article in February featuring a series of damning allegations about their parenting in an interview with their former nanny Becky Gauld.

Katie and Peter win battle over nanny accusations

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

Katie Price and Peter Andre give a statement outside the high court, after winning a libel trial about a tabloid article portraying them as not-so-good parents.

Price, aka Jordan, and former pop star Andre, sued the News Of The World for an article in February featuring a series of naughty allegations about their parenting and an interview with their very former nanny Becky Gauld.

The couple left the High Court in London today after being awarded undisclosed, ‘substantial damages’ and a public apology. They will split the awarded damages between charity and a trust fund for their children.

(more photos after the jump)

 

(more…)